The Joe Blow Report 2

Everything Is About Something Different

Posts Tagged ‘Ron Paul

Vote – VOTE Your Heart Out – SUCKER

leave a comment »

Here is an apt article to start out this so-called Election Year. Actually, it’s more like an Auction Year.

Vote Obama – if you want a centrist Republican for US president

“Because Barack Obama has adopted so many core Republican beliefs, the US opposition race is a shambles”

Now, add this article:

Progressives and the Ron Paul fallacies

And you will began to see why voting is such a total waste of time and energy for any American that actually believes in meaningful change. That is, unless you believe in the Republican “change” back to the Stone Ages.

–Joe

Advertisements

Is the Syrian Solution Coming to America?

leave a comment »

Ron Paul on the Danger of Political and Social Upheaval

What happens when paper currencies, the dollar, lose their value?

If you’re concerned about your future in this country, this is well worth reading. Click the link – Watch the video.

A follow-up to this, published on The Hill: Rep. Paul introduces bill to cancel $1.6T in debt held by Federal ReserveWhat’s happening to the U.S. dollar reserve and why, including his solution. [H/T Lew Rockwell] – [Source]

–Joe

Ron Paul on the Deficit

leave a comment »

Anyone interested in another point of view might find this article of interest:

By Pete Kasperowicz – 07/19/11 11:20 AM ET

Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) on Tuesday predicted that the U.S. would default on its debt.

“When a country is indebted to the degree that we’re indebted, the country always defaults,” the 2012 GOP presidential candidate said on the House floor. “We will default because the debt is unsustainable.”

Paul predicted that the U.S. government would dodge the best solution, which is to impose real spending cuts.

“The reason we don’t cut spending is, one side loves entitlements and one side loves war,” he said.

But he warned against the temptation of simply continuing to send out government checks backed with more borrowed money. He said choosing this course would mean default would come in the form of significant inflation and a further erosion of the dollar.

“If we don’t understand this, this default will not be because we don’t send out the checks,” Paul said. “We will send out the checks. It will be defaulted on because people will get their money back, or they will get their Social Security checks, and it won’t buy anything.”

He warned this is a “much, much worse” solution.

Paul was one of several Republicans who spoke Tuesday morning on the House floor in anticipation of the GOP’s “Cut, Cap and Balance”
bill. Rep. Wally Herger (R-Calif.) was one who spoke in favor of the bill, and said higher spending under the Obama administration was a proven failure.

“The tragic reality is that the president’s big spending policies only made things worse,” Herger said. “Now, with the national debt at crisis levels, he is standing in the way of common sense solutions, offering only lectures, not leadership.

“As a matter of conscience, this Congress cannot support allowing President Obama to continue to steer America’s debt past a point of no return,” he added.

Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) said Democrats have no plan for handling the debt crisis, citing the Senate’s rejection earlier this year of the Obama administration’s proposed 2012 budget.

“There is no leadership on the part of the Democrats,” she said.

Rep. Mike Quigley (Ill.) was one of the few Democrats who spoke on the debt ceiling Tuesday morning. He argued that Republicans were using the myth of former President Reagan to justify efforts to tie the debt-ceiling increase to spending cuts.

Quigley said that if Reagan could see the current debate, “he’d see his most dedicated followers using his name as justification for saying no to honoring our debts. He’d see his legacy used to play chicken with the world’s greatest economic engine.”

The contents of this site are © 2011 Capitol Hill Publishing Corp., a subsidiary of News Communications, Inc.

–Joe

Written by Joe Blow

July 20, 2011 at 9:32 pm

The Law and the Lawless – Are We Barbarians?

leave a comment »

David Mizner on Daily Kos has a very thought-provoking article where he raises some timely and important questions ALL Americans need to confront in: Don’t Apologize, Greenwald. Don’t Back Down. Here he steps up to support Glenn Greenwald’s efforts to confront the criminal conduct of this country and its leaders, as he says:

“But I think he chose his words with utmost care. They were designed to expose in stark terms the shaky moral and legal footing of the U.S’s claim that it can basically do whatever the hell it wants in the name of FIGHTINGEVIL.

And he should be able to do so without progressives claiming hysterically and dishonestly that he’s “comparing” Obama to OBL. Even mass murderers have rights, and even the United States is bound by international law, or should be.”

As someone that also supports Glenn Greenwald’s strong critique of “American exceptionalism” this is an issue that needs to be emphasized on this Report.

Here is another interesting link with the following excerpt about the interview of Lew Rockwell: 200. Rule of Law? We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Rule of Law – Brian Wilson interviews Lew Rockwell on WSPD

Government is not exempt from moral law. Murder, kidnapping, theft, prison, torture, execution, assassinations, corruption of judges, and telling the big lies followed by cover up are all business as usual for our elective dictatorship regime. Rather than baying at the moon and dancing in the streets painted blue, white and red, over what might have been the take down of Osama bin Laden, more Americans should get skeptical about government blather. Most may not really want liberty, but thinking minorities accomplish everything. Ron Paul’s newest book Liberty Defined gives us the unstoppable weapon – the truth.

These are the kinds of issues that we think need to be emphasized. Why? Because what goes around ALWAYS comes around.

–Joe

Choice and the U.S. Constitution

leave a comment »

ronpaul190When you read this from Ron Paul ask yourself why would local businessmen and women in Humboldt County NOT want the marijuana laws repealed. Here’s a link to Ernie Branscomb’s blog for a good example. He also posted this tongue-in-cheek back Saturday, August 9, 2008: And you thought Marijuana was harmless…

End the War on Drugs – Ron Paul

We have recently heard many shocking stories of brutal killings and ruthless violence related to drug cartels warring with Mexican and US officials. It is approaching the fever pitch of a full blown crisis. Unfortunately, the administration is not likely to waste this opportunity to further expand government. Hopefully, we can take a deep breath and look at history for the optimal way to deal with this dangerous situation, which is not unprecedented.

Alcohol prohibition in the 1920’s brought similar violence, gangs, lawlessness, corruption and brutality. The reason for the violence was not that making and selling alcohol was inherently dangerous. The violence came about because of the creation of a brutal black market which also drove profits through the roof. These profits enabled criminals like Al Capone to become incredibly wealthy, and militantly defensive of that wealth. Al Capone saw the repeal of Prohibition as a great threat, and indeed smuggling operations and gangland violence fell apart after repeal. Today, picking up a bottle of wine for dinner is a relatively benign transaction, and beer trucks travel openly and peacefully along their distribution routes.

Similarly today, the best way to fight violent drug cartels would be to pull the rug out from under their profits by bringing these transactions out into the sunlight. People who, unwisely, buy drugs would hardly opt for the back alley criminal dealer as a source, if a coffeehouse-style dispensary was an option. Moreover, a law-abiding dispensary is likely to check ID’s and refuse sale to minors, as bars and ABC stores tend to do very diligently. Think of all the time and resources law enforcement could save if they could instead focus on violent crimes, instead of this impossible nanny-state mandate of saving people from themselves!

If these reasons don’t convince the drug warriors, I would urge them to go back to the Constitution and consider where there is any authority to prohibit private personal choices like this. All of our freedoms – the freedom of religion and assembly, the freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, the right to be free from unnecessary government searches and seizures – stem from the precept that you own yourself and are responsible for your own choices. Prohibition laws negate self-ownership and are an absolute affront to the principles of freedom. I disagree vehemently with the recreational use of drugs, but at the same time, if people are only free to make good decisions, they are not truly free. In any case, states should decide for themselves how to handle these issues and the federal government should respect their choices.

My great concern is that instead of dealing deliberatively with the actual problems, Congress will be pressed again to act quickly without much thought or debate. I can’t think of a single problem we haven’t made worse that way. The panic generated by the looming crisis in Mexico should not be redirected into curtailing more rights, especially our second amendment rights, as seems to be in the works. Certainly, more gun laws in response to this violence will only serve to disarm lawful citizens. This is something to watch out for and stand up against. We have escalated the drug war enough to see it only escalates the violence and profits associated with drugs. It is time to try freedom instead.

So what’s wrong with trying Ron Paul’s version of freedom?

Joe had to smile to himself when he read this:

Think of all the time and resources law enforcement could save if they could instead focus on violent crimes, instead of this impossible nanny-state mandate of saving people from themselves!

Sounds like something Joe stood for the last 50 years. Maybe it’s time to throw off the “mandate.” Be responsible and demand accountability while you still can.

But then, no one would make any money off your slavery, would they?

–Joe

Compliments of Kenny’s Sideshow
%d bloggers like this: