The Joe Blow Report 2

Everything Is About Something Different

Goody Two-Shoes

with 2 comments

[UPDATE :: April 7, 2011 – Trash-Talking – A Way of Life]

The Report “Goody Two-Shoes” is about the unabashed, shameless hypocrisy of this areas number one Opinionator. Well, possibly with the rare exception of Hank Sims who seems to be growing more and more vocal since he departed the North Coast Journal. For example, his My Word contribution in the Times-Standard, Wednesday, April 6, 2011, was at least appropriate, positive and pertinent to present circumstances and the local community. As exhibited by Dave Stancliff’s responding commentary on my comparison of his trite newspaper rant on “frivolous lawsuits” when he was publicly threatening me occasionally noticing some of his weekly efforts to “game the system.”

A really good example of how he tries to “game” the system, in this case, his systemic support for personal  credibility and legitimacy, is contained in the total disconnect and irreverence for his own credibility. Not one time EVER has he produced any personal integrity regarding the issue he raises. Refute his egregious accusations, and he simply moves on to something more profane, insulting and abusive. That course of conduct is, by definition, the obvious characteristic of an empty, hollow, self-serving and amoral person without any substance whatsoever.

Is Joe Blow attacking the messenger? Hardly. As it turns out, nearly two years of his demonstrated conduct as recorded on this blog demonstrates that he never had a “message” other than himself. He is the message. As it turns out that “message” is a stupid joke. He’s a person caught in his own trap; what he wants, he can’t give. What he gets is exactly what he gives.


[UPDATE :: Friday, April 8, 2011]

This Report’s responses regarding the bogus issues raised by Dave Stancliff in the comments he makes on this blog are at an end. You can read the reasons why here. As demonstrated below by his total disconnect from the very issues he raises, his only purpose is to use the opportunity to get off on making his kind of degenerate, filthy commentary. I’ve given him amply opportunity to workout whatever differences he believes exist. Not one time has he stopped his personal assaults. Enough is enough.

Goody Two-Shoes

Dave Stancliff came on my blog, again, and called ME a “hypocrite.” Can anyone believe this guy? Pathetic Parasite, is all I can say!

Read for yourself: Joe, you know that I tried to meet with you to personally talk out our differences and you refused. Yet, here you preach the only way to solve problems is “peacefully one on one.” [Emphasis added]

Who is this “Joe” he talking to, anyway? He’s been attacking Joe Blow as if he is some literal, carnal person for over two years. Joe Blow is a nameless, non-person alter ego. Joe Blow is and can be anyone at any time. What is it with this guy anyway? Again he demonstrates his inability to distinguish between reality and fantasy. He apparently read what I wrote and is totally clueless.

EVERYTHING about Dave Stancliff’s years-long assaults, his very personal attacks, name-calling, incessant hyperbole, ad hominem diatribe and paranoid threats are recorded on this blog. What I know or whatever he THINKS or BELIEVES “I know” are only the results of his paranoid delusions or his self-emasculating dreams manifest in his continual verbal conjectures or spoken worthless opinions. Notice I did not call him a LIAR, even though that is exactly what this statement is, a bald-faced lie: “Joe, you know that I tried to meet with you to personally talk out our differences and you refused.”

I repeatedly and categorically stated that Joe Blow did not possess any “differences” with Dave Stancliff despite the fact that right from Joe’s very first observation Stancliff personally and publicly attacked the author of this Report or at-least tried to, and never stopped. Dave Stancliff went to WAR with Joe Blow. He NEVER showed any intentions of trying to make peace or “resolve our differences.” More importantly even as he made his disingenuous offer to “meet Joe” he continued with his personal assaults, diatribe and lying personal accusations. That act, consequently BECAME a “difference.” A false, lying accusation personally directed at someone is the equivalent of a physical slap in the face. How does anyone “talk” out the “differences” while getting slapped in the face? You don’t, you can’t. All you can do is try to defend yourself. In that regard, to test his honesty and sincerity and as a visible or literal, sign of good faith, the equivalent to a handshake, I asked him do one simple, little thing for me, to simply stop. He refused.

Later, I found out what his real intentions were. He was trying to destroy this blog and physically attack the author and his family. Read the complete article.

What I know for a fact is HE REFUSED to “work out ANY difference,” including one he said we had when I asked him and when given the opportunity. So, he lied.

Now, about this nonsense: “Yet, here you preach the only way to solve problems is “peacefully one on one.” What is this, “I preach,” but he doesn’t? You would think this guy sits on God’s right hand the way he knows what other people believe and think. PREACH? No one put a gun to his head and made him come to my blog home” and read what was written there. Here is a quote of what Joe said:

“There’s another lesson learned here and that is when you don’t communicate, and I am not talking about arbitrary ultimatums either, the only other way to resolve issues is WAR. The choice: either talk peacefully or act violently. When people refuse to recognize your legitimate rights to exist same as them and then act on that belief refusing to talk to you, they are at de facto war with you.”

Does that sound like I said there is “only” one “way to solve problems”? To continue on in the article:

“The best solution is to work out the problems personally – peacefully – one on one. Whenever you bring in a surrogate to speak for you or act in your behalf, you are ostensibly at war.”

Lest anyone forget, at the time of this writing, Dave Stancliff already threatened me with legal action. Since actions speak louder than words, the HYPOCRITE self-manifests for all to see. It isn’t the fact of what observations Joe Blow makes regarding Dave Stancliff that harms or degrades his self-made importance and value. It is the fact that he has proven himself to be an unprincipled, deviate, and corrupt individual incapable of rational and decent behavior.

Dave April 1, 2011 at 9:31 pm

you know that I tried to meet with you to personally talk out our differences and you refused. Yet, here you preach the only way to solve problems is “peacefully one on one.”

Now the shoes on the other foot for you.

How do explain this hyprocrisy after this post?



Written by Joe Blow

April 3, 2011 at 2:22 am

Posted in Uncategorized

2 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Inability to distinquish fact from reality…I’d say that describes you pretty well Joe.

    A person is writing this blog, despite your denial of that very real fact. You are the person. You have chosen to call yourself Joe Blow.

    Therefore, when someone talks to you they say “Joe.”
    Are you following me here?
    If I’m going too fast just let me know Joe.
    You are Joe.
    See…that wasn’t hard was it?

    You continue to call me names (unprincipaled deviate isn’t very nice Joe) and make no sense when you reply to my comments.

    Any rational reader couldn’t help but conclude that you have some serious anger issues coupled with delusions of always being right.

    We’ve got a loop going here…I write a column (that you don’t have to read but do religiously every Sunday)and then you attack whatever I said. It doesn’t matter if I say the sky is blue, you say it’s red.

    I suppose I should appreciate that I have such a dedicated follower…if only you weren’t such a foul-mouthed and angry one!


    April 3, 2011 at 5:30 am

  2. […] since everything is all about him. What is his proof? The latest record shows here and again you can read it for yourself here that he doesn’t need proof. He said it’s so, therefore, what more do you need? He is […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: