Archive for April 2008
The Medieval Inquisitor of Dark Age Hate-Mongering speaks trash again.
Lets start to set some records straight. First, Joe Blow is not some sort of “educated elite” like Mr. Franco-Simmons, Managing Editor of The Eureka Reporter. He had the presence of mind to NOT waste his time getting his thinking “educated” by any so-called philosophy professor, either Christian conservative or Pagan liberal. From his short bio it should be glaring clear that he did get educated on what biggotry, discrimination, hate-mongering, religious and political prejudices are. It was common knowledge during the last four years of his High School education that they (the teachers and officials) were not going to waste his good grades on him, so his grades went to those that needed them so they could go on to become “educated elite” and avoid going to Vietnam.
This so-called “opinion” printed under the Editor’s Notebook, in the Eureka Reporter Sunday, April 27, 2008, titled: “Professor’s Attack On Student’s Religion Is Outrageous” manages to find something going on in the state of New York to dump his trash all over Humboldt County again. Joe’s wordprocessor of this worthless opinion produces 578 words or 3111 letters that include, by his estimation, the following examples trash-talk in bold print:
- “the assault of Christianity by a bigoted, close-minded and discriminatory educational elite“
- “wayward philosophy professor attacked a student’s Constitutionally-protected freedoms”
- “renegade ‘teacher’ … gall to insult“
- common ivory tower bias of liberal universities”
- “liberal” and “Hostile to conservatives”
- “outcast as a conservative” … “preached its dogma to impressionable students”
- “havens for dogmatic liberal agendas promulgated by a radical elite” … “no shame” … “no tolerance“
- “undignified behavior“
Mr. Franco-Simmons’ hypocrisy is best expressed in his own words, modified slightly by Joe for effect: “Public and some private newspapers of higher learning have become havens for dogmatic conservative agendas promulgated by a radical elite that have no shame and no tolerance for the views of others.” “These conservative owners, editors, columnist and reporters should be ashamed of their undignified behavior. It defeats the objective of what any newspaper should foster: the independent search for truth.”
These kinds of people and everyone that enables them, not too long ago burned innocent so-called “educated elite” woman at the stake for simply using a few herbs to help with health issues or trying to help their fellow sisters deliver babies without dying at the hands of their Christian religious superiors. The atrocities, including this so-called “opinion” committed by the beliefs of this kind of “Christianity” to stop all kinds of thinking has brought this earth to its knees. Oh! you say, he’s just exercising his Constitutional rights to speak his mind. Okay. So, what’s next Mr. Franco-Simmons, Christian death squads in Humboldt County dealing with the “bigoted, close-minded and discriminatory educational elite”?
Joe says, “Mr. Franco-Simmons would be a far better person and citizen if he put and kept his so-called Christian beliefs where they belong, in his garbage can.” Or is he?
When Joe first moved back to Eureka he began noticing these newspapers showing up in his front yard. Upon examination he found out they were a free daily newspaper, The Eureka Reporter. In time he became aware that the name, “Arkley” was associated with the paper and that the Managing Editor was Glen Franco-Simmons, which meant nothing to him. At first he enjoyed the fact that it was “free” and appreciated the large print. It didn’t take him long to realize that Mr. Franco-Simmons educated political point of view permeated the paper. He also noted how the paper, under the irresponsible rights of free “political” expression, allowed people to denigrate, degrade and otherwise assault one an other on a regular basis. The “paper” made its perverse point without having to say a word.
Now remember, the paper and Joe uses the word loosely, because what Joe read was printed on paper, was free, available and Joe did read it of his own free will. Too, he needed to start a fire once in awhile and the paper worked relatively well, so he allowed that blue pile to continue to daily adorn his property. Occasionally, like today, he asked himself why when he reads the Editor’s Notebook by Glen Franco-Simmons. The hypocrisy, ignorance and filthy bile that spews from that commentary does everyone that supports that paper justice. No one, and Joe means NO ONE, gave Mr. Franco-Simmons the god-given right to force others that do not think or believe as he does at the point of a gun or threat of nuclear holocaust or any other individual or country to submit to what he constitutes as “human rights” or his kind of “peace” including those he judges as believers “in one God, one Creator, who is omnipresent over all.” Mr. Franco-Simon memory of history is “atypical” of his type, spawned right out of the Dark Ages. Personally, Joe wants no part of your kind of peace for he knows full well that in this Universe what goes around, comes around.
What does that mean, “what goes around, comes around”? Mr. Franco-Simmons ends by saying: “In my heart, I only hope that the three religions can somehow find unity in their diversity and pave the way for peace, but my intellect tells me that won’t happen until there is a massive spilling of blood — perhaps on a scale not seen before; perhaps, in the future, it will involve nuclear war. Let us hope not. The path to religious tolerance is much easier and preferable than the path to oblivion.”
“The path to religious tolerance”? Talk about a hypocrite! There is not one word of tolerance, religious or otherwise, in what this guy just spewed out. In fact, Joe observes, if Americans are facing “unrelenting hostility” around the World or are on “the path to oblivion,” they need look no further than this kind of person and his diatribe for the cause. What you freely give out Mr. Franco Simmons, you shall surely get back in spades! That may serve justice for your children, but Joe wants no part of it for his.
Mr. Leo Sears writes in the Friday, April 11, 2008, Times-Standard under the heading “Legislators, please take note,” located on the Internet http://www.times-standard.com/leosears/ci_8887956. Here you will find what he actually said. Below is Joe Blows re-write observation:
DISCLAIMER! Please note, I changed some of his words. I changed the words “pit bull” to “child,” “pit bulls” and “pit bull’s” to “children(‘s).” Further, I changed the word “animal” and “dog” to “human.” Any other modifications are also noted.
Leo Sears/for the Times-Standard as modified by Joe Blow:
As Dr. Joseph Humble (at the Cutten Animal Health Center) told of all the “humans”, including two of his “children,” he’s treated a result of attacks by “children,” rottweilers and similar breeds, his support of a breeding ban wasn’t surprising.
I already knew that PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of “Humans”) endorses a ban on breeding these types of “children.” But PETA’s support for the policy “at many ‘human’ shelters across the country [where] any ‘child’ that comes through the front door doesn’t go out the back door alive” made me take a second look.
PETA president Ingrid Newkir describes the “children’s” ancestor, the Staffordshire terrier, as a human concoction, bred as a weapon. “These ‘children’ were designed specifically to fight other ‘humans’ and kill them, for sport. Hence the barrel chest, the thick hammer-like head, the strong jaws, the perseverance and the stamina. Pits can take down a bull weighing in at over a thousand pounds, so a human being a tenth of that weight can easily be seriously hurt or killed.”
Those defending the “children” say they are no more inherently dangerous than any other breed of “human” — claiming that there are no bad “children”, just bad owners.
Not so, according to Lt. Abe Gomez of Contra Costa Animal Services. “The ‘child’ is bred for fighting. These ‘children’ can just go off. And when they do, they cause tremendous damage. They don’t growl,” he said. “[They] usually just come right after you.”
Even in mixed breeds, there are characteristics we can recognize, and they have certain tendencies that are dangerous.
It isn’t just poor training or bad owners mistreating them, although that makes an attack more likely. It is the breed — and the damage they can do is greatly out of proportion to what another breed can do.
”They were bred for intolerance and the prey drive,” says Trish King, director of behavior and training at the Marin Humane Society. “Those two things, in combination, can cause tragedies. The prey drive is an instinct. A reflex. It can be sparked by movement. If something causes the ‘child’ to become overexcited, it might become angry. They can over-respond to stimuli.”
Despite opposition from owners and ”human” organizations, some cities and states are working on “breed specific” legislation against “children” and other breeds that were originally bred as a “weapon.”
“Those who argue against a breeding ban and the shelter euthanasia policy for ‘children’ are naïve,” said Newkir. “Many are loving and will kiss on sight, but many are unpredictable. An unpredictable Chihuahua is one thing, an unpredictable ‘child’ another.”
”People who genuinely care about ‘children’ won’t be affected by a ban on ‘child’ breeding,” she said. “They can go to the shelter and save one of the countless other breeds and lovable mutts sitting on death row. We can only stop killing pits (Joe adds “children”) if we stop creating new ones. Legislators, please take note.”
Joe says, “No bad children, only bad teachers.”
“God gave us children to teach us all the things we refuse to learn.”
So, why do we allow them to walk up and down the middle of busy streets forcing cars to move into oncoming traffic or stop? What are they trying to teach us about ourselves?
Welcome to WordPress.com & The Joe Blow Report.
Joe also has his Report on Google’s – Blogger:
Why is the Report here too? Mostly, because we just like what is offered and what I saw when reading other blogs on WordPress.
According to the “The Story of Blogger” they got started in 1999 (http://www.blogger.com/about). In 1996, Joe’s nemesis started his first Internet website. Using that site as a focus point, The Joe Blow Report was born with the same basic format or purpose then as now. Comments regarding Joe’s observations were submitted by email and posted to the report by hand, the old fashioned way. Most commentators didn’t mind giving up their emails. In fact some encouraged further dialogue. At that time Joe learned that he was nothing more than a babe in the woods. So, he moved on, literally and figuratively, getting re-educated.
He doesn’t think much will come of his “reports” today anymore than it did before. Times have changed, so you never know. He welcomes comments and whatever else . . .
Please be aware that The Joe Blow Report speaks for itself. You may or may not agree, but just remember, that is your issue. The Report is offered as a free gift to whomever desires to read it. Please accept it as such. The Report respects the rights of all individuals to be who and what they are. All the same there are consequences for what each individual does and does not do. If the Report stimulates a little thinking, it has fulfilled it’s purpose.
Joe Blow fully understands that whatever is posted on the Internet or printed in newspapers or spoken on television or on the radio bears the responsibility for being PUBLIC property, albeit sometimes copyrighted. Let’s hope that those Joe reports about understand that as well. In other words, if you do not want to read or hear about someones observations, keep quiet!
The Joe Blows of this World have been silenced far too long. Perhaps the resurrection of this Report indicates a change. Let’s hope so.